Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss a petition seeking an order requiring USCIS to conduct a naturalization interview. The court held that the petitioner’s failure to respond to the motion constituted a waiver and dismissed the action without prejudice.
Holdings
- A petitioner's failure to respond to a motion constitutes a waiver.
- Respondents' motion to dismiss should be granted and the action dismissed without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether petitioner's failure to respond to respondents' motion to dismiss constituted a waiver warranting dismissal.
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice after petitioner failed to respond to the motion to dismiss.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Hansen v. Westly, No. 24-cv-2653 (ECT/JFD), 2024 WL 4851300, at *2 (D. Minn. Nov. 21, 2024)(followed)
- Daniel v. Honeywell Int’l Inc., No. 22-cv-3184 (ECT/DLM), 2023 WL 6392404, at *2 (D. Minn. Oct. 2, 2023), aff’d, No. 23-3476, 2024 WL 3634227 (8th Cir. Aug. 2, 2024)(followed)
- Hernandez-Diaz v. Equifax Info. Servs., No. 22-cv-2302 (JRT/JFD), 2023 WL 2025123, at *2 (D. Minn. Feb. 15, 2023)(followed)
- Cox v. Harpsted, No. 22-cv-0478 (PJS/DJF), 2022 WL 16541087, at *1 (D. Minn. Oct. 28, 2022)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…