Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granted a detained noncitizen’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court ordered the government to return the petitioner to Minnesota if necessary, release the petitioner without new conditions, return seized personal property, and file a compliance report, concluding that the government had not shown the existence of an administrative warrant supporting detention.
Holdings
- The government failed to establish that petitioner was detained pursuant to a warrant or otherwise lawfully detained under the asserted mandatory-detention authority.
- The petition for a writ of habeas corpus was granted because the government did not establish that petitioner's detention was lawful.
Questions Presented
- Whether petitioner was unlawfully detained without a bond hearing under the applicable immigration-detention provisions.
- Whether the government established that petitioner was arrested pursuant to a warrant triggering detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether immediate release was an appropriate remedy when the government failed to produce evidence establishing lawful detention.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (5)
- Velasco Hurtado v. Bondi, No. 0:26-CV-546, 2026 WL 184884 (D. Minn. Jan. 24, 2026)(followed)
- Ahmed M. v. Bondi, No. 25-CV-4711, 2026 WL 25627, at *3 (D. Minn. Jan. 5, 2026)(followed)
- Fontenot v. Crow, 4 F.4th 982, 1058 (10th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Gladden v. Gidley, 337 F.2d 575, 578 (9th Cir. 1964)(followed)
- Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.S. 275 (1941)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…