Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted the parties’ joint motion to remand after the plaintiff’s amended complaint removed all federal-law claims. Relying on Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger, the court held that federal-question and supplemental jurisdiction no longer supported the case and directed the Clerk to remand it to Montana’s Eighteenth Judicial District Court in Gallatin County.
Holdings
- When a plaintiff amends the operative complaint after removal to eliminate all federal-law claims, federal-question jurisdiction dissolves and supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims disappears; the federal court must remand the case to state court.
Questions Presented
- Whether a federal court must remand a removed action when the plaintiff’s post-removal amended complaint eliminates all federal-law claims and leaves only state-law claims.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (1)
- Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. 22, 39, 145 S. Ct. 41, 54-55 (2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…