Deais P. Clark v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

No. CV-15-34-GF-BMM (D. Mont. Dec. 8, 2025) · United States District Court for the District of Montana, Great Falls Division · December 8, 2025 · No. CV-15-34-GF-BMM

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Montana grants Plaintiff Deais P. Clark’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). The court finds that the requested $40,482.75 fee, representing the remaining portion of withheld past-due benefits after administrative fees, is reasonable under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart and related Ninth Circuit precedent. The court concludes that counsel obtained a successful remand and favorable Social Security disability determination and did not cause the lengthy administrative proceedings.

Holdings

  1. The requested $40,482.75 attorney-fee award did not exceed 25 percent of Clark's past-due benefits and therefore complied with the statutory cap.
  2. The requested $40,482.75 award was reasonable under the circumstances and was properly granted.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the requested attorney-fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) was within the statutory 25 percent cap.
  2. Whether the contingent-fee agreement and requested $40,482.75 award were reasonable in light of the character and results of counsel's representation, responsibility for delay, and proportionality to the time expended.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Palos v. Colvin, No. CV 15-04261-DTB, 2016 WL 5110243 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2016)(persuasive)
  • Daniel v. Astrue, No. EDCV 04-01188-MAN, 2009 WL 1941632 (N.D. Cal. July 2, 2009)(persuasive)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…