Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Montana grants Plaintiff Deais P. Clark’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). The court finds that the requested $40,482.75 fee, representing the remaining portion of withheld past-due benefits after administrative fees, is reasonable under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart and related Ninth Circuit precedent. The court concludes that counsel obtained a successful remand and favorable Social Security disability determination and did not cause the lengthy administrative proceedings.
Holdings
- The requested $40,482.75 attorney-fee award did not exceed 25 percent of Clark's past-due benefits and therefore complied with the statutory cap.
- The requested $40,482.75 award was reasonable under the circumstances and was properly granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the requested attorney-fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) was within the statutory 25 percent cap.
- Whether the contingent-fee agreement and requested $40,482.75 award were reasonable in light of the character and results of counsel's representation, responsibility for delay, and proportionality to the time expended.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002)(followed)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Palos v. Colvin, No. CV 15-04261-DTB, 2016 WL 5110243 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2016)(persuasive)
- Daniel v. Astrue, No. EDCV 04-01188-MAN, 2009 WL 1941632 (N.D. Cal. July 2, 2009)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.