Michael Ross v. North Lake County Public Library and Abbi Dooley

Ross · United States District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division · March 3, 2026 · No. CV 25-121-M-KLD

Summary

The court grants Michael Ross leave to proceed in forma pauperis and permits his Title II Americans with Disabilities Act claims against the North Lake County Public Library and its director to proceed past statutory screening. The court finds that the allegations concerning Ross’s blindness, denial of library access and services, and alleged failure to provide accommodations are sufficient at this stage, including for potential monetary relief. The court denies Ross’s motion for summary judgment without prejudice as premature and directs service of the complaint.

Holdings

  1. The complaint stated a plausible Title II ADA claim and was not subject to dismissal at the screening stage.
  2. At the screening stage, the complaint adequately alleged facts from which deliberate indifference and entitlement to seek monetary relief under Title II could reasonably be inferred.
  3. The motion for summary judgment was denied without prejudice as premature.
  4. Ross's application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted and the filing fee was waived.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Ross's complaint stated a plausible Title II ADA claim sufficient to survive screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
  2. Whether the complaint alleged sufficient facts to support a claim for monetary damages under Title II of the ADA.
  3. Whether Ross's motion for summary judgment was premature because it was filed before defendants appeared and before discovery.
  4. Whether Ross was entitled to proceed in forma pauperis and receive service by the United States Marshal.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (15)

  • Zixiang Li v. Kerry, 710 F.3d 995, 999 (9th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical Center, 521 F.3d 1097, 1104 (9th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1121 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677–78 (2009)(followed)
  • States v. Ritchie, 342 F.3d 903, 908 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Pena v. Gardner, 976 F.2d 469, 471 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Weilburg v. Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Chaset v. Fleer/Skybox International, 300 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Association v. Klamath Medical Service Bureau, 701 F.2d 1276, 1293 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…