Jonathan F. Ramos v. Columbus Hydraulics Company, LLC

United States District Court for the District of Nebraska · November 26, 2025 · No. 8:25-cv-00140

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Nebraska dismissed without prejudice Jonathan F. Ramos’s amended complaint against Columbus Hydraulics Company, LLC. Ramos alleged that the company refused to hire him because he is deaf, in violation of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act. The court held that he failed to plausibly allege that he was qualified for the welding position, identify reasonable accommodations, or provide nonconclusory facts showing that the refusal to hire was because of his disability.

Holdings

  1. The amended complaint failed to plausibly allege that Plaintiff was qualified to perform the essential functions of the position because it alleged that he failed the welding test and refused an additional opportunity to take it.
  2. The amended complaint failed to state a plausible disability-discrimination claim under Title I of the ADA or the companion provisions of the NFEPA.
  3. The amended complaint was dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the amended complaint plausibly alleged disability discrimination under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
  2. Whether the amended complaint plausibly alleged a disability-discrimination claim under the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act.
  3. Whether summary dismissal was appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (19)

  • Ramos v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., 8:24CV455 (D. Neb.), Filing No. 1 at 7(relied_on)
  • Nat’l Ass’n of the Deaf v. Trump, No. 20CV2107, 2020 WL 4452083 (Complaint ¶¶ 25-25)(relied_on)
  • United States v. Jackson, 640 F.2d 614, 617 (8th Cir.)(relied_on)
  • Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 760 F.3d 843, 848-49 (8th Cir.)(relied_on)
  • Hopkins v. Saunders, 199 F.3d 968, 973 (8th Cir.)(relied_on)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 569-70 (2007)(relied_on)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(relied_on)
  • Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 915 (8th Cir.)(relied_on)
  • Martin v. Aubuchon, 623 F.2d 1282, 1286 (8th Cir.)(relied_on)
  • Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 511-12 (2002)(relied_on)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…