Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nebraska dismissed Kevin L. Ballard’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice. The court held that Ballard named the wrong respondent and had not exhausted available state-court remedies. The court also denied a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- A § 2254 petition is subject to dismissal when the petitioner names a respondent that was not involved in the state proceedings and is not the petitioner's custodian.
- A state prisoner must fairly present each federal constitutional claim to the state courts through one complete round of the State's established appellate review process before seeking federal habeas relief, absent a statutory exception.
- A certificate of appealability should not issue because Ballard failed to make the showing required to appeal the procedural dismissal of his § 2254 petition.
Questions Presented
- Whether the § 2254 petition could proceed when Ballard named the Johnson County District Court rather than the state official or entity responsible for his custody.
- Whether the federal habeas petition was subject to dismissal because Ballard had not exhausted available state-court remedies.
- Whether Ballard was entitled to a certificate of appealability from the procedural dismissal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- State v. Kevin Ballard, Sr., CR 25-133 (Saunders Cnty. Ct.)(cited for procedural history)
- State v. Kevin L. Ballard, Sr., CR25-41 (Saunders Dist. Ct.)(cited for procedural history)
- Stutzka v. McCarville, 420 F.3d 757, 760 n.2 (8th Cir. 2005)(applied)
- O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 844-45 (1999)(applied)
- Akins v. Kenney, 410 F.3d 451, 454-55 (8th Cir. 2005)(applied)
- Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 520 (1982)(applied)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…