Aaniyah Clay v. Radius Global Solutions LLC, et al.

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada adopted two Reports and Recommendations concerning Aaniyah Clay’s claims against Radius Global Solutions LLC and Trans Union. The court dismissed specified claims and all claims against Trans Union with prejudice, denied Trans Union’s request for attorney’s fees, and dismissed Trans Union as a party.

Holdings

1. Objections that merely repeat arguments already rejected by the magistrate judge are insufficient and must be overruled.
2. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act does not confer a private right of action.
3. The court adopted both Reports and Recommendations in full, dismissed Plaintiff's specified FCRA, intrusion-upon-seclusion, and FDCPA claims with prejudice, dismissed all claims against Trans Union with prejudice, denied Trans Union's request for attorney's fees, and dismissed Trans Union as a party.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Plaintiff's objection to the finding that Radius Global Solutions had a permissible purpose to access her consumer report required rejection of the Report and Recommendation.
2. Whether the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act provides Plaintiff a private right of action and whether amendment of that claim would be futile.
3. Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's recommendations dismissing specified claims and all claims against Trans Union, while denying Trans Union's request for attorney's fees.

Disposition

other