Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada grants Defendant Javed’s motion to extend the rebuttal expert and discovery deadlines. The court finds good cause based on pending motions to quash and related discovery issues, denies the request for fees, and sets revised deadlines for discovery, rebuttal expert disclosures, dispositive motions, and the joint pretrial order.
Holdings
- The court granted Defendant Javed's motion to extend the rebuttal expert and discovery deadlines because good cause existed.
- The court denied the request for fees because the circumstances would make an award unjust.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendant established good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) and Local Rule 26-3 to extend the rebuttal expert and discovery deadlines.
- Whether an award of fees was appropriate in connection with the requested extension.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Zivkovic v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…