John Harvey v. Torrent Leasing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.

No. 2:25-cv-00824-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 15, 2025) · United States District Court for the District of Nevada · December 15, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-00824-JAD-DJA

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada granted U.S. Bank's motion to dismiss John Harvey's complaint concerning garnishment of his Nevada bank account to satisfy an Illinois judgment. The court dismissed the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims with prejudice because the defendants were private actors and Harvey did not adequately allege joint action with a state actor, and it dismissed the remaining state-law claims without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The court denied leave to amend, vacated the clerk's entry of default against Torrent Leasing, denied the motion to stay as moot, and closed the case.

Holdings

  1. A private party is subject to suit under § 1983 only when the alleged constitutional violation is fairly attributable to the government, such as through conspiracy or sufficiently substantial joint action with a state actor. Merely appearing in court or prevailing in litigation does not establish state action or joint action.
  2. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Harvey's remaining state-law claims and dismissed them without prejudice.
  3. Leave to amend was denied because amendment would be futile.
  4. The court could dismiss the claims against Torrent Leasing sua sponte because Torrent Leasing was in a position similar to U.S. Bank with respect to the dispositive state-action and jurisdictional defects.
  5. The clerk's entry of default was vacated because the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the claims.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Harvey stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against private defendants by adequately alleging state action or joint action with a state actor.
  2. Whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Harvey's state-law claims after dismissing the federal claim.
  3. Whether Harvey should be granted leave to amend his complaint.
  4. Whether the court could dismiss the claims against the nonappearing defendant and vacate the clerk's entry of default.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (31)

  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 562, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Ortez v. Washington County, 88 F.3d 804, 807 (9th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)(followed)
  • Leite v. Crane Co., 749 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Kirtley v. Rainey, 326 F.3d 1088, 1092 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Sutton v. Providence St. Joseph Medical Center, 192 F.3d 826, 835 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24, 27-28 (1980)(followed and distinguished)
  • O'Handley v. Weber, 62 F.4th 1145, 1159-60 (9th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Tsao v. Desert Palace, 698 F.3d 1128, 1140 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 31.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…