Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada dismisses Justin A. Kurpiel’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice. The court concludes that Kurpiel failed to file an amended complaint as ordered, failed to update his mailing address, and failed to state a claim, and it directs the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case.
Holdings
- A district court may dismiss an action when a party fails to obey a court order, and Kurpiel's failure to file the required amended complaint justified dismissal without prejudice.
- The public interest in expeditious resolution, the court's need to manage its docket, the presumption of prejudice from unreasonable delay, and the inadequacy of lesser alternatives outweighed the policy favoring resolution on the merits.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order requiring an amended complaint.
- Whether dismissal was warranted under the Ninth Circuit's five-factor framework governing dismissal for failure to prosecute or failure to obey a court order.
- Whether another deadline or other lesser sanction constituted a meaningful alternative to dismissal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (8)
- Thompson v. Hous. Auth. of City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- In re Phenylpropanolamine Prod. Liab. Litig., 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)
- Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 992 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 643 & n.4 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…