Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada grants Plaintiff Kendra McKenzie’s unopposed motion to remand under the local defendant rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2), and remands the case to Nevada state court. The Court also finds Plaintiff entitled to attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), subject to substantiation of the amount by motion if the parties do not agree.
Holdings
- The motion to remand was granted as unopposed, and the action was remanded to the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada.
- Plaintiff was entitled to recover attorney's fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); failure to substantiate the amount was not a basis to deny the fee request outright. The amount remained subject to substantiation.
- The court retained jurisdiction over the attorney's-fee dispute notwithstanding remand.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be remanded because removal violated the local defendant rule under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2).
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to attorney's fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) despite not having substantiated the amount of fees requested.
- Whether the court retained jurisdiction to resolve the attorney's-fee dispute after remanding the action.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Fischer v. SJB-P.D., Inc., 214 F.3d 1115, 1121 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Nan Hanks & Assocs. v. Original Footwear Co., 2018 WL 3155247, at *6 (E.D. Cal. June 26, 2018)(followed)
- Moore v. Permanente Med. Grp., Inc., 981 F.2d 443, 445 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…