Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada granted Leandre Martell’s motion to compel and motion for production of documents in an action against Officer D. Lowery and other defendants. The court compelled defendants to respond to the discovery requests, while requiring the parties to meet and confer before raising any objections in future motions.
Holdings
- The motion to compel was granted, and defendants were ordered to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests.
- The motion for production of documents was construed as a motion to compel documents and was granted.
- Granting the motions did not waive defendants' objections; any objections must be addressed after the parties meet and confer before a motion is filed.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's motion to compel discovery should be granted.
- Whether plaintiff's motion for production of documents should be construed as a motion to compel documents and granted.
- Whether defendants should be required to meet and confer with plaintiff before filing any discovery objections or related motions.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 601 (D. Nev.)(followed)
- Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir.)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.)(followed)
- Britt v. Simi Valley United School District, 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…