Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada denied without prejudice the plaintiffs’ motions to seal exhibits related to discovery and a joint status report. The court directed the Clerk’s Office to keep the exhibits under seal pending resolution of defendants’ separate motions to seal.
Holdings
- A stipulated protective order alone does not justify sealing court records.
- The Clerk's Office was directed to maintain ECF Nos. 85 and 88 under seal until further order while the court considers defendants' motions to seal.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiffs' motions to seal should be granted when they relied primarily on a stipulated protective order.
- Whether the documents should remain temporarily under seal while the defendants' later-filed motions to seal are considered.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1183 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…