Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada overruled Phillip Charles Aught, Jr.’s objection to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The court adopted the recommendation, dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to comply with orders and demonstrate eligibility for in forma pauperis status, denied the IFP application as moot, and directed the clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- Aught failed to demonstrate eligibility for in forma pauperis status because his repeated applications did not adequately establish his inability to pay court fees and did not satisfy the court's instructions requiring complete and detailed answers.
- Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because Aught failed to comply with repeated orders requiring a complete IFP application or payment of the filing fee.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should reject the magistrate judge's report and recommendation recommending dismissal for failure to comply with court orders.
- Whether Aught demonstrated eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
- Whether dismissal without prejudice was warranted based on repeated noncompliance with court orders and failure to timely pay the filing fee or submit a sufficient IFP application.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948)(followed)
- UnitedHealth Grp., Inc. v. United Healthcare, Inc., 2014 WL 4635882, at *1 (D. Nev. Sept. 16, 2014)(followed)
- Ogunsalu v. Nair, 117 F. App'x 522, 523 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- In re Phenylpropanolamine, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…