Francisco Uzcategui Villasmil v. Luis Soto, et al.

Uzcategui Villasmil v. Soto · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · February 25, 2026 · No. Civil Action No. 26-1765 (GC)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied without prejudice Francisco Uzcategui Villasmil’s motion for a temporary restraining order and denied his request for an order to show cause in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas proceeding. The Court ordered that he not be transferred from the District of New Jersey or removed from the United States pending further order, and directed Respondents to answer the Petition within fourteen days and provide the relevant administrative record.

Holdings

  1. Petitioner was not entitled to an ex parte TRO because the petition and supporting materials did not clearly present specific facts showing that immediate and irreparable injury would occur before respondents could be heard, and counsel did not provide the written certification required by Rule 65(b).
  2. The court was not required to issue an immediate show-cause order or set the expedited hearing requested by petitioner because Habeas Rule 4 provides an alternative procedure applicable to § 2241 cases and governs the court's initial screening and response process.
  3. Dismissal without an expedited answer and production of the record was not warranted at the screening stage.
  4. Under the All Writs Act, the court could order that petitioner not be transferred from the District of New Jersey or removed from the United States pending further order of the court.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether petitioner satisfied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)'s requirements for an ex parte temporary restraining order.
  2. Whether the court was required to issue an expedited order to show cause and hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 2243.
  3. Whether the petition should be dismissed at screening under Habeas Rule 4 or instead proceed with an answer and production of the record.
  4. Whether the court could prohibit petitioner's transfer from the District of New Jersey or removal from the United States pending further proceedings under the All Writs Act.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Sira v. Bondi, No. 26-667, 2026 WL 189875, at *1 n.1 (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2026)(followed)
  • Martinez-Cruz v. Soto, No. 25-18254, 2025 WL 352124, at *1 n.3 (D.N.J. Dec. 9, 2025)(applied)
  • Schumaker v. Knight, No. 23-20834, 2024 WL 866347, at *1 (D.N.J. Feb. 29, 2024)(followed)
  • Iremashvili v. Rodriguez, No. 15-6320, 2017 WL 935441, at *2, *4 (D.N.J. Mar. 9, 2017)(followed)
  • Benitez Castro v. Bondi, No. 25-17598, 2025 WL 3213829, at *1 n.5 (D.N.J. Nov. 18, 2025)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…