Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied Jayadeep R. Deshmukh’s motions for a stay pending appeal and emergency injunctive relief, as well as the Trustee’s motion to dismiss. The court held that Deshmukh had not shown a likelihood of success on his argument that a marital residence held as a tenancy by the entirety was exempt from process under New Jersey law and 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(B). The court also held that the legal issue had been addressed by the Bankruptcy Court and therefore was not waived on appeal.
Holdings
- A movant who fails to make the requisite showing of likelihood of success on the merits is not entitled to a stay pending appeal or preliminary injunctive relief, and the court need not analyze the remaining stay factors.
- For purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(B), a debtor's interest in New Jersey tenancy-by-the-entirety property is not exempt from process because the debtor's individual right of survivorship may be alienated and levied upon by the debtor's individual creditor.
- The debtor's failure to file a formal opposition to the trustee's exemption objection did not require dismissal where the Bankruptcy Court expressly considered and decided the legal issue, including on reconsideration.
Questions Presented
- Whether the debtor demonstrated a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits to obtain a stay pending appeal or temporary restraining order.
- Whether property held as a tenancy by the entirety in New Jersey is exempt from process under New Jersey law for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(B).
- Whether the debtor waived the legal issue by failing to formally oppose the trustee's exemption objection in the Bankruptcy Court.
- Whether the trustee's motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted based on alleged failure to preserve the issue below.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (28)
- Baron & Budd, P.C. v. Unsecured Asbestos Claimants Committee, 321 B.R. 147, 157 (D.N.J. 2005)(followed)
- Donaldson v. Bernstein, 104 F.3d 547, 551 (3d Cir. 1997)(followed)
- In re CellNet Data Systems, Inc., 327 F.3d 242, 244 (3d Cir. 2003)(followed)
- United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948)(followed)
- International Union, UAW v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 820 F.2d 91, 95 (3d Cir. 1987)(followed)
- International Olympic Committee v. S.F. Arts & Athletics, 781 F.2d 733, 738 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- In re Revel AC, Inc., 802 F.3d 558, 567-71 (3d Cir. 2015)(followed)
- In re Trans World Airlines, Inc., No. 01-56, 2001 WL 1820325, at *2 (Bankr. D. Del. Mar. 27, 2001), aff'd, 322 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 2003)(followed)
- In re W.R. Grace & Co., 475 B.R. 34, 205 (D. Del. 2012)(followed)
- United States v. Cianfrani, 573 F.2d 835, 846 (3d Cir. 1978)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 28.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…