In re Jayadeep R. Deshmukh

Deshmukh · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · March 3, 2026 · No. Civil Action No. 25-17615 (MAS)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied Jayadeep R. Deshmukh’s motions for a stay pending appeal and emergency injunctive relief, as well as the Trustee’s motion to dismiss. The court held that Deshmukh had not shown a likelihood of success on his argument that a marital residence held as a tenancy by the entirety was exempt from process under New Jersey law and 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(B). The court also held that the legal issue had been addressed by the Bankruptcy Court and therefore was not waived on appeal.

Holdings

  1. A movant who fails to make the requisite showing of likelihood of success on the merits is not entitled to a stay pending appeal or preliminary injunctive relief, and the court need not analyze the remaining stay factors.
  2. For purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(B), a debtor's interest in New Jersey tenancy-by-the-entirety property is not exempt from process because the debtor's individual right of survivorship may be alienated and levied upon by the debtor's individual creditor.
  3. The debtor's failure to file a formal opposition to the trustee's exemption objection did not require dismissal where the Bankruptcy Court expressly considered and decided the legal issue, including on reconsideration.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the debtor demonstrated a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits to obtain a stay pending appeal or temporary restraining order.
  2. Whether property held as a tenancy by the entirety in New Jersey is exempt from process under New Jersey law for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(B).
  3. Whether the debtor waived the legal issue by failing to formally oppose the trustee's exemption objection in the Bankruptcy Court.
  4. Whether the trustee's motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted based on alleged failure to preserve the issue below.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (28)

  • Baron & Budd, P.C. v. Unsecured Asbestos Claimants Committee, 321 B.R. 147, 157 (D.N.J. 2005)(followed)
  • Donaldson v. Bernstein, 104 F.3d 547, 551 (3d Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • In re CellNet Data Systems, Inc., 327 F.3d 242, 244 (3d Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948)(followed)
  • International Union, UAW v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 820 F.2d 91, 95 (3d Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • International Olympic Committee v. S.F. Arts & Athletics, 781 F.2d 733, 738 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • In re Revel AC, Inc., 802 F.3d 558, 567-71 (3d Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • In re Trans World Airlines, Inc., No. 01-56, 2001 WL 1820325, at *2 (Bankr. D. Del. Mar. 27, 2001), aff'd, 322 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • In re W.R. Grace & Co., 475 B.R. 34, 205 (D. Del. 2012)(followed)
  • United States v. Cianfrani, 573 F.2d 835, 846 (3d Cir. 1978)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 28.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…