Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denies Plaintiff Louis Rodrigues’s motion for sanctions concerning the filing of medical information and administratively terminates his cross-motion for summary judgment. The Court treats the cross-motion as a response to Defendants’ supplemental summary judgment briefing and states that it will resolve the summary judgment motions by separate opinion and order. The case concerns claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the New Jersey Civil Rights Act involving alleged denial of religious services and chaplain visits.
Holdings
- Sanctions were not warranted because the medical report plaintiff identified had in fact been filed under seal and was accessible only to the court and the parties.
- The court administratively terminated plaintiff's purported cross-motion for docket-management purposes and treated it as a response to defendants' supplemental summary judgment briefing.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's purported cross-motion for summary judgment should be accepted as filed despite the absence of leave to file such a motion.
- Whether defendants should be sanctioned for filing plaintiff's personal medical information.
- Whether the purported cross-motion should be considered as plaintiff's response to defendants' supplemental summary judgment motions.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…