Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey administratively terminated Manish Kumar’s § 2241 habeas petition challenging a Form I-860 Notice and Order of Expedited Removal. The court directed the Clerk to provide a pro se filing form and permitted Kumar to reopen the case within 30 days by addressing his representation status and submitting either an in forma pauperis application or the five-dollar filing fee.
Holdings
- A pro se petition submitted electronically in violation of the District of New Jersey's filing rule and without either the required filing fee or an IFP application may be administratively terminated without filing.
- Administrative termination is not a dismissal for statute-of-limitations purposes, and a timely case may be reopened without being barred by the statute of limitations.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should administratively terminate a pro se electronically filed habeas petition that did not comply with the district's paper-filing rule and was unaccompanied by either the required filing fee or an IFP application.
- Whether administrative termination without filing constitutes a dismissal or creates a statute-of-limitations bar.
- What steps petitioner must take to reopen the case.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Papotto v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., 731 F.3d 265, 275 (3d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands, 705 F.3d 80, 84 n.2 (3d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Dasilva v. Sheriff's Department, 413 F. App'x 498, 502 (3d Cir. 2011) (per curiam)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…