Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed a pro se prisoner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint after screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Claims against an officer concerning allegedly false disciplinary charges and excessive force were dismissed without prejudice for insufficient factual allegations, while claims against the New Jersey Department of Corrections and New Jersey State Prison were dismissed with prejudice because those entities are not persons subject to suit under § 1983. The court granted leave to amend.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to state a plausible due process claim because it did not allege whether Hayes received a hearing or an opportunity to rebut the allegedly false charges. The claim against Jovanovic was dismissed without prejudice.
- The complaint failed to state a plausible Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim because it did not describe the circumstances of the incident or allege facts showing that Jovanovic acted maliciously and sadistically rather than in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline. The claim was dismissed without prejudice.
- The New Jersey Department of Corrections and New Jersey State Prison are not persons within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and therefore cannot be sued for relief under that statute. The claims against them were dismissed with prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the allegation that a correctional officer falsified institutional disciplinary infractions stated a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim without facts concerning a disciplinary hearing or opportunity to rebut the charges.
- Whether the allegation that a correctional officer beat the plaintiff with a correctional stick stated a plausible Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim without facts concerning the circumstances and purpose of the force.
- Whether the New Jersey Department of Corrections and New Jersey State Prison are persons subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (17)
- Phillips v. County of Allegheny, 515 F.3d 224, 228 (3d Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(followed)
- Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210 (3d Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc., 708 F.3d 470, 483 n.17 (3d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc., 704 F.3d 239, 245 (3d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988)(followed)
- Malleus v. George, 641 F.3d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Richardson v. Sherrer, 344 F. App'x 755, 757 (3d Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Thomas v. McCoy, 467 F. App'x 94, 97 (3d Cir. 2012)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…