Mohamed S. Yasin v. Sajeda Jamhour, et al.

Yasin · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · March 6, 2026 · No. Civil Action No. 25-02389 (SDW) (JRA)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey grants without prejudice three motions to dismiss Mohamed S. Yasin’s amended complaint arising from the death of his brother. The court dismisses claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the New Jersey Civil Rights Act, the New Jersey Wrongful Death Act, and the New Jersey Survivor’s Act based on pleading deficiencies, failure to allege a constitutional right to a criminal investigation, inadequate Monell allegations, and failure to plead a wrongful act causing death. The court also holds that the Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office is entitled to Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity and allows thirty days to amend.

Holdings

  1. Claims against the Passaic County Sheriff's Office must be dismissed where the complaint contains no specific factual allegations concerning that office's involvement and instead relies on impermissible group pleading.
  2. Plaintiff failed to state § 1983 or NJCRA claims against the individual defendants because he did not identify each defendant's conduct and failed to plead a constitutional violation based on the alleged failure to conduct an adequate criminal investigation.
  3. The New Jersey Civil Rights Act claims fail for the same reasons as the parallel § 1983 claims because NJCRA claims are interpreted analogously and rise or fall with § 1983 claims.
  4. Plaintiff failed to state a Monell claim against the City of Paterson because he did not adequately plead a constitutional violation, identify a relevant municipal policy or custom, identify a final policymaker, or allege a pattern of similar incidents.
  5. Plaintiff failed to state claims under the New Jersey Wrongful Death Act and Survivor's Act because he did not allege that any Paterson Defendant committed a wrongful act that caused the decedent's death.
  6. The Passaic County Prosecutor's Office is entitled to Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity for claims arising from its law-enforcement and investigative functions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the claims against the Passaic County Sheriff's Office satisfied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and Rule 12(b)(6) despite relying on group pleading and lacking factual allegations connecting that office to the alleged wrongdoing.
  2. Whether Plaintiff adequately pleaded § 1983 and New Jersey Civil Rights Act claims against individual officers based on an allegedly inadequate investigation.
  3. Whether Plaintiff adequately pleaded municipal liability against the City of Paterson under Monell.
  4. Whether Plaintiff adequately pleaded claims under the New Jersey Wrongful Death Act and Survivor's Act.
  5. Whether the Passaic County Prosecutor's Office was entitled to Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity under the Fitchik factors.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (28)

  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Mayer v. Spanel International Ltd., 605 F.3d 223, 229 (3d Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Roman v. County of Hudson, No. 23-2811, 2024 WL 1757150, at *7 (D.N.J. Apr. 23, 2024)(followed)
  • In re Ojo, No. 21-11357, 2021 WL 3732904, at *2 (D.N.J. Aug. 23, 2021)(followed)
  • Falat v. County of Hunterdon, No. 12-6804, 2013 WL 1163751, at *3 (D.N.J. Mar. 19, 2013)(followed)
  • Janowski v. City of North Wildwood, 259 F. Supp. 3d 113, 120-21 (D.N.J. 2017)(followed)
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Zimmerman v. PepsiCo, Inc., 836 F.2d 173, 181 (3d Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Coles v. Carlini, 162 F. Supp. 3d 380, 405 (D.N.J. 2015)(followed)
  • Trafton v. City of Woodbury, 799 F. Supp. 2d 417, 430, 443 (D.N.J. 2011)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 28.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…