Sejal Dave v. Montclair Board of Education

No. 2:25-cv-01412 (BRM) (CF) (D.N.J. Feb. 27, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · February 27, 2026 · No. 2:25-cv-01412 (BRM) (CF)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled on Montclair Board of Education’s motion to dismiss Sejal Dave’s claims arising from her medical leave and nonrenewal of her teaching contract. The court dismissed the ADA discrimination and retaliation claims without prejudice because Dave had not exhausted the required administrative remedies. The court denied dismissal of her FMLA interference claim, holding that her allegations concerning the failure to provide individualized notice of FMLA rights were sufficient to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

Holdings

  1. The ADA disability-discrimination and retaliation claims were dismissed without prejudice because Dave acknowledged that the EEOC had not issued a notice of right to sue.
  2. The complaint sufficiently stated an FMLA interference claim where Dave alleged that the Board failed to provide individualized notice of her FMLA rights, that she would have structured her leave differently had she received notice, and that the resulting leave extending beyond twelve weeks led to her termination or nonrenewal.
  3. The court declined to consider the policy because it was not integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Dave's ADA disability-discrimination and retaliation claims should be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and obtain an EEOC notice of right to sue.
  2. Whether Dave sufficiently pleaded an FMLA interference claim based on the Board's alleged failure to provide individualized notice of her FMLA rights.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (16)

  • Philips v. Cnty. of Alleghany, 515 F.3d 224, 228 (3d Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d 1410, 1426 (3d Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • Shaw v. Digit. Equip. Corp., 82 F.3d 1194, 1220 (1st Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 556-57, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286 (1986)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)(followed)
  • In re Rockefeller Ctr. Props. Sec. Litig., 184 F.3d 280, 287 (3d Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Doe v. Princeton Univ., 30 F.4th 335, 342, 345 (3d Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Capps v. Mondelez Global, LLC, 847 F.3d 144, 155 (3d Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Ross v. Gilhuly, 755 F.3d 185, 191-92 (3d Cir. 2014)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…