Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey administratively terminated a § 2241 habeas matter brought by Valentina Jimenez Osorio as next friend of immigration detainee Marlon Danilo Osorio Zapata. The court held that Osorio had not shown why the detainee could not file on his own behalf and, as a non-attorney, could not represent him without counsel. The court denied the next-friend request without prejudice and permitted reopening upon submission of a signed petition by the detainee or a counseled motion satisfying the next-friend requirements.
Holdings
- A purported next friend must clearly establish why the real party in interest cannot appear on his own behalf, must demonstrate dedication to the real party's best interests, and must satisfy the applicable relationship and authorization requirements. Osorio failed to satisfy the first requirement because she did not explain why the detainee could not file the petition himself.
- A nonattorney may not represent another party in federal court merely by styling himself or herself as a next friend.
- The request to proceed as next friend was denied without prejudice, and the matter was administratively terminated subject to reopening if the identified defects were timely cured.
Questions Presented
- Whether Valentina Jimenez Osorio established the requirements to proceed as the immigration detainee's next friend in a § 2241 habeas proceeding.
- Whether a nonattorney may represent another party in federal court as a next friend without retaining an attorney.
- What disposition was appropriate when the purported next friend failed to establish standing and authorization to litigate on the detainee's behalf.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994)(followed)
- Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 161–64 (1990)(followed)
- Dyer ex rel. Dyer v. Warden of S. Woods State Prison, No. 25-14807, 2025 WL 2783868, at *2 (D.N.J. Sept. 30, 2025)(followed)
- Figueroa v. Rivera, 147 F.3d 77, 82 (1st Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Berrios v. New York City Hous. Auth., 564 F.3d 130, 132 (2d Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 139 (2d Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Schlemmer v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 804 F. App’x 127, 128 n. 2 (3d Cir. May 13, 2020)(followed)
- Kerrigan, No. 2021 WL 6424641, at *2(followed)
- Burton v. United States, No. 20-5322, 2020 WL 2899496, at *2 (D.N.J. June 3, 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.