Amanda M. V. v. Frank Bisignano, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

Amanda M. V. · United States District Court for the District of New Mexico · December 31, 2025 · No. 1:24-cv-00089-KRS

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico granted Plaintiff’s motion for $11,504.00 in attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a favorable Social Security disability benefits determination after remand. The court found the representation adequate, the fee request timely and reasonable, and ordered counsel to refund the previously awarded $6,695.40 in EAJA fees to Plaintiff.

Holdings

  1. A court may award attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) when it remands a Social Security case for further proceedings and the Commissioner ultimately awards the claimant past-due benefits.
  2. The requested $11,504.00 § 406(b) fee was reasonable and appropriate because counsel's representation was adequate, achieved a fully favorable result, caused no delay, was timely requested, and was proportionate to the 25.4 hours expended.
  3. When fees are awarded under both the EAJA and § 406(b), counsel must refund the lesser award to the claimant; here, counsel was ordered to refund the $6,695.40 EAJA award.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could authorize attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) after remanding the Social Security case for further proceedings and the agency subsequently awarded past-due benefits.
  2. Whether the requested $11,504.00 fee was reasonable under § 406(b).
  3. Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded EAJA fee to Plaintiff after receiving the § 406(b) award.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (8)

  • Wrenn ex rel. Wrenn v. Astrue, 525 F.3d 931, 933–34 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493–96, 505 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 807–08 (2002)(followed)
  • Culbertson v. Berryhill, 586 U.S. 53, 57–62 (2019)(followed)
  • Marquez v. Astrue, CIV 10-1165 CG (D.N.M. Aug. 29, 2012)(followed)
  • Ferguson v. Barnhart, Civ. No. 02-00823 (D.N.M. May 31, 2006)(followed)
  • Faircloth v. Barnhart, 398 F. Supp. 2d 1169, 1174 (D.N.M. 2005)(followed)
  • Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…