Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico grants Anthony Lee Gallegos’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) after a sentence-four remand resulted in a fully favorable Social Security disability decision and an award of past-due benefits. The court approves $16,356.37 in fees for counsel’s 27.3 hours of federal-court work and directs counsel to refund the previously awarded $6,973.90 EAJA fee, subject to any Treasury offset.
Holdings
- A request for attorney fees under § 406(b) should be filed within a reasonable time after the Commissioner's decision awarding benefits, and this request was timely because it was filed shortly after the SSA issued its Notice of Award.
- The requested § 406(b) fee was permissible because it did not exceed 25 percent of the claimant's past-due benefits, and the 25-percent cap applies to court-stage fees rather than aggregating court-stage and agency-stage fees.
- The requested $16,356.37 fee was reasonable and could be paid from Gallegos's past-due benefits.
- When counsel receives both EAJA fees and § 406(b) fees for the same representation, counsel must refund the smaller EAJA award to the claimant.
Questions Presented
- Whether the attorney's request for $16,356.37 in fees for representation before the district court was timely under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
- Whether the requested fee complied with the statutory 25-percent limitation for court-stage representation.
- Whether the requested § 406(b) fee was reasonable under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 495-98, 505 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Frazier v. Apfel, 240 F.3d 1284, 1286 (10th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Orner v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1307, 1309 (10th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Culbertson v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 517, 518-19 (2019)(followed)
- Whitehead v. Richardson, 446 F.2d 126, 128 (6th Cir. 1971)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 793, 798-99, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
- Harbert v. Astrue, No. CIV-06-90-SPS, 2010 WL 3238958, at *1 n.1 (Aug. 16, 2010)(followed)
- Early v. Astrue, 295 F. App'x 916, 919 n.2 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…