Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico grants Baljinder Singh’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging immigration detention. The court orders the United States Attorney’s Office to answer within ten business days and adds federal immigration officials as respondents.
Holdings
- The court granted Singh leave to proceed in forma pauperis because he appeared unable to prepay the $5 habeas filing fee.
- The petition raised a colorable claim for relief, and the United States Attorney's Office was required to answer and show cause why the requested relief should not be granted.
- The court added the Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Security, relevant ICE officials, and the warden as additional respondents.
Questions Presented
- Whether Singh should be permitted to proceed without prepaying the habeas filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
- Whether the allegations in Singh's § 2241 petition raised a colorable claim concerning his immigration detention sufficient to require the respondents to answer.
- Whether the proper government officials and facility warden should be added as respondents in the immigration-detention habeas proceeding.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Lowmaster v. Dir., Bureau of Prisons, 2024 WL 5135970, at *1 (D. Kan. Dec. 17, 2024)(followed)
- Danderson v. Page, 2024 WL 3913051, at *2 (E.D. Okla. Aug. 20, 2024)(followed)
- Garcia Sanchez v. Noem, et al., 25-cv-1219 KG/JFR(followed)
- Pu Sacvin v. De Anda-Ybarra, 2025 WL 3187432, at *3 (D.N.M.)(followed)
- Danierov v. Noem, 2026 WL 45288, at *2 (D.N.M.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…