Brunsen Burner Company and Loud Cloud, LLC v. GRP NM LLC, Eugenia Smith, Fredrick Lawerence, Customer Does 1-10

Brunsen Burner · United States District Court for the District of New Mexico · March 5, 2026 · No. CIV 24-0952 JB/LF

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico grants GRP NM LLC’s motion to set aside the Clerk’s Entry of Default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c). The court concludes that GRP NM’s failure to respond was not willful, that the plaintiffs were not sufficiently prejudiced by the delay, and that GRP NM presented potentially meritorious defenses. The court consequently denies the plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment.

Holdings

  1. GRP NM showed good cause to set aside the Clerk's Entry of Default because its failure to respond was not willful, plaintiffs did not establish legally sufficient prejudice from the delay, and GRP asserted sufficiently meritorious defenses.
  2. Default judgment was not warranted because GRP NM did not willfully or deliberately halt the adversarial process and the circumstances did not show prejudicial delay requiring protection of plaintiffs.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether GRP NM LLC demonstrated good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) to set aside the Clerk's Entry of Default.
  2. Whether plaintiffs were sufficiently prejudiced by GRP NM's delay to justify maintaining the default.
  3. Whether GRP NM presented a sufficiently meritorious defense to permit the case to proceed on the merits.
  4. Whether the circumstances justified entry of default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • Hunt v. Ford Motor Co., No. 94-3054, 1995 WL 523646, at *3 (10th Cir. Aug. 29, 1995)(followed)
  • In re Dierschke, 975 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Watkins v. Donnelly, 551 F. App'x 953, 958 (10th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Gomes v. Williams, 420 F.2d 1364, 1366 (10th Cir. 1970)(followed)
  • Pinson v. Equifax Credit Info. Servs., Inc., 316 F. App'x 744, 749-50 (10th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Noland v. City of Albuquerque, No. CIV 08-0056JB/LFG, 2009 WL 2424591, at *1 (D.N.M. June 18, 2009)(followed)
  • In re Rains, 946 F.2d 731, 732-33 (10th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Berthelsen v. Kane, 907 F.2d 617, 621 (6th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • United States v. Austin, 426 F.3d 1266, 1274 (10th Cir. 2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…