Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico grants Plaintiff David M. H.’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The court finds that Plaintiff is unemployed, that his monthly expenses exceed his income, and that he is unable to prepay the fees and costs of the proceeding.
Holdings
- Plaintiff demonstrated that he was unable to prepay the fees and costs of the proceeding, so the court granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff satisfied the requirements for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Menefee v. Werholtz, 368 F. App'x 879, 884 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Ragan v. Cox, 305 F.2d 58, 60 (10th Cir. 1962)(followed)
- Scherer v. Kansas, 263 F. App'x 667, 669 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Holmes v. Hardy, 852 F.2d 151, 153 (5th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339, 344 (1948)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…