Summary
The court dismissed the pro se plaintiff’s case without prejudice for failing to file an amended complaint and a long-form application to proceed in forma pauperis as ordered. The court also denied the plaintiff’s short-form application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs.
Holdings
- The court dismissed the action without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with the orders requiring him to file an amended complaint and a long-form application to proceed in forma pauperis.
- The court denied Plaintiff's short-form application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court could dismiss the action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with orders requiring an amended complaint and a long-form application to proceed in forma pauperis.
- Whether Plaintiff's short-form application to proceed without prepaying fees should be denied after he failed to submit the required long-form application.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Gustafson v. Luke, 696 F. App'x 352, 354 (10th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…