Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico granted Michael Gonzales’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a sentence-four remand and a favorable disability determination. The court authorized $16,401 in fees, reduced by the previously awarded $7,000 Equal Access to Justice Act fee, for a net award of $9,401 payable from Gonzales’s past-due benefits.
Holdings
- The requested $16,401 fee was permissible because it represented approximately 16.8 percent of the total past-due benefits and was below the 25-percent cap applicable to court representation under § 406(b).
- The requested fee was reasonable and appropriate.
- The authorized § 406(b) fee was reduced by the $7,000 EAJA award, resulting in a net attorney-fee payment of $9,401; if the full $16,401 were paid, counsel must refund the EAJA award to Gonzales.
Questions Presented
- Whether the requested attorney fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) complied with the statutory 25-percent cap.
- Whether the requested § 406(b) fee was reasonable in light of the character of the representation, the result obtained, counsel's time spent, any delay, and comparable awards.
- Whether the § 406(b) award had to be reduced or offset by the previously awarded EAJA fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Ortega v. Kijakazi, No. 1:20-cv-1245 GBW, 2023 WL 372878, at *2–4 (D.N.M. Jan. 24, 2023)(followed)
- Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 497 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Culbertson v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 517, 523 (2019)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 807–08 (2002)(followed)
- Gordon v. Astrue, 361 F. App’x 933, 935 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Martinez v. Colvin, No. 1:15-cv-0806 LF, 2016 WL 9774938, at *2 (D.N.M. Nov. 30, 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…