Summary
The court grants Michael O. Hayes’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The court orders Hayes to show cause and file a single amended complaint addressing potential defects including representation of a minor, Younger abstention, prosecutorial and sovereign immunity, supervisory liability, and claims against governmental subunits. The order also defers service and warns of possible dismissal or sanctions for noncompliance.
Holdings
- Plaintiff qualified to proceed in forma pauperis because his affidavit and financial information established that he was unable to pay the costs of the proceeding.
- The court declined to order service at that time because it ordered Plaintiff to show cause and file an amended complaint.
- A nonlawyer proceeding pro se may bring his own claims but may not represent the claims of his minor child or other family members in federal court.
- The complaint was deficient because it used multiple captions, lacked sufficiently specific and nonconclusory allegations identifying each defendant's conduct, and did not clearly identify the claims and relief sought against each defendant.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff qualified to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
- Whether the complaint's assertion of claims on behalf of Plaintiff's minor son and family was permissible when Plaintiff was proceeding pro se and was not an attorney.
- Whether the complaint should be amended or dismissed based on potential Younger abstention, prosecutorial immunity, Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity, lack of supervisory liability, lack of separate suability of governmental subunits, and failure to satisfy federal pleading requirements.
- Whether service should be ordered before the show-cause and amendment issues were resolved.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (30)
- Menefee v. Werholtz, 368 F. App'x 879, 884 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Ragan v. Cox, 305 F.2d 58, 60 (10th Cir. 1962)(followed)
- Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339, 344 (1948)(followed)
- Lowrey v. Sandoval County Children Youth and Families Department, 2023 WL 4560223, at *2 (10th Cir. July 17, 2023)(followed)
- Fymbo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 213 F.3d 1320, 1321 (10th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Kanth v. Lubeck, 123 F. App'x 921, 923 n.1 (10th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Meeker v. Kercher, 782 F.2d 153, 154 (10th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Rienhardt v. Kelly, 164 F.3d 1296, 1302 (10th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- D.L. v. Unified School District No. 497, 392 F.3d 1223, 1228 (10th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83, 100 n.3 (1998)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 30.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…