Miteiko Daniil v. FNU LNU

No. 25-cv-1024-KG-DLM (D.N.M. Jan. 9, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of New Mexico · January 9, 2026 · No. No. 25-cv-1024-KG-DLM

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico dismisses Miteiko Daniil’s letter-pleading seeking asylum without prejudice because the court lacks jurisdiction to grant asylum in the first instance. The court directs the Clerk’s Office to provide Form I-589 materials and a blank 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, explaining that any asylum application must be submitted to the appropriate immigration authorities and any custody challenge must be filed separately.

Holdings

  1. The district court lacks jurisdiction to grant or adjudicate an asylum application in the first instance; asylum applications must be submitted through the procedures established by the Department of Homeland Security and, for defensive applications, the immigration court.
  2. The letter-pleading must be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
  3. A petitioner who seeks to challenge continued immigration detention may file a separate habeas proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241; a § 2241 petition cannot substitute for the required Form I-589 asylum application.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court has jurisdiction to adjudicate a noncitizen's asylum application in the first instance.
  2. Whether the petitioner's request for asylum should be dismissed without prejudice when the proper asylum application must be submitted to immigration authorities.
  3. Whether the petitioner may separately challenge continued immigration detention through a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (2)

  • Munoz Materano v. Arteta, 2025 WL 2630826, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 2025)(cited)
  • Aydin v. Zeleke, 2025 WL 3499246, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2025)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…