Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico dismisses Miteiko Daniil’s letter-pleading seeking asylum without prejudice because the court lacks jurisdiction to grant asylum in the first instance. The court directs the Clerk’s Office to provide Form I-589 materials and a blank 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, explaining that any asylum application must be submitted to the appropriate immigration authorities and any custody challenge must be filed separately.
Holdings
- The district court lacks jurisdiction to grant or adjudicate an asylum application in the first instance; asylum applications must be submitted through the procedures established by the Department of Homeland Security and, for defensive applications, the immigration court.
- The letter-pleading must be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
- A petitioner who seeks to challenge continued immigration detention may file a separate habeas proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241; a § 2241 petition cannot substitute for the required Form I-589 asylum application.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court has jurisdiction to adjudicate a noncitizen's asylum application in the first instance.
- Whether the petitioner's request for asylum should be dismissed without prejudice when the proper asylum application must be submitted to immigration authorities.
- Whether the petitioner may separately challenge continued immigration detention through a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Munoz Materano v. Arteta, 2025 WL 2630826, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 2025)(cited)
- Aydin v. Zeleke, 2025 WL 3499246, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2025)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…