Summary
The United States District Court for the District of North Dakota denied Trinity Health’s motion for leave to file exhibits under seal in connection with its motion for summary judgment. The court held that the public’s right of access to judicial records required a compelling, document-specific justification for sealing and that the defendant had not adequately addressed less restrictive alternatives such as redaction.
Holdings
- A party seeking to seal judicial records must demonstrate a compelling interest that overrides the public's qualified First Amendment right of access, explain why sealing is necessary, and show why less restrictive alternatives such as redaction are inadequate. The request must be narrowly tailored and supported by a detailed, document-by-document analysis.
- The motion for leave to file the exhibits under seal was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether Trinity Health demonstrated a compelling interest sufficient to overcome the public's common-law and qualified First Amendment right of access to exhibits filed in connection with a dispositive motion.
- Whether the requested sealing was narrowly tailored and supported by a document-by-document analysis addressing less restrictive alternatives.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)(followed)
- Webster Groves School District v. Pulitzer Publishing Co., 898 F.2d 1371, 1376 (8th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- United States v. McDougal, 103 F.3d 651, 658 (8th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- In re Search Warrant for Secretarial Area Outside Office of Gunn, 855 F.2d 569, 574 (8th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Romero v. Drummond Co., 480 F.3d 1234, 1245 (11th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Baxter International, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 297 F.3d 544, 546, 548 (7th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- In re Neal, 461 F.3d 1048, 1053 (8th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California, 464 U.S. 501, 509-11 (1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…