Cathianna Snyder Rosenthal v. Officer Tallon Johnston & Clackamas County

Rosenthal · United States District Court for the District of Oregon · December 23, 2025 · No. 3:25-cv-00484-SB

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon partially granted defendants’ motion to dismiss claims brought by Cathianna Snyder Rosenthal arising from the death of her son, Phillip Snyder, after his arrest and release from the Clackamas County Jail. The court held that Rosenthal lacked standing to pursue claims on behalf of Snyder’s estate because she had not been appointed personal representative by an appropriate Oregon court, and further explained that counsel would be required because the estate had multiple potential beneficiaries. The court stayed the case for 45 days to allow Rosenthal to seek appointment, retain counsel, and potentially file a second amended complaint; her familial-association claim remained pending.

Holdings

  1. Rosenthal lacked standing to prosecute claims on behalf of Snyder's estate because Oregon law places authority to pursue wrongful-death and related injury claims in the estate's personal representative, and she had not obtained an appointment from an appropriate Oregon court.
  2. If Rosenthal obtains an Oregon appointment and reasserts claims on behalf of Snyder's estate, she must retain counsel because the estate has multiple beneficiaries or potential creditors.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Rosenthal had standing or capacity under Article III and Oregon law to assert claims on behalf of Snyder or his estate.
  2. Whether an out-of-state appointment as administrator ad litem gave Rosenthal authority to pursue Snyder's claims in the District of Oregon.
  3. Whether Rosenthal could proceed pro se as personal representative of an estate with multiple beneficiaries or creditors.
  4. What relief and procedural opportunity were appropriate after dismissal of the estate claims.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (32)

  • Hebrard v. Nofziger, 90 F.4th 1000, 1004 n.1 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556-57, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Sernas v. Cantrell, 857 F. App'x 400, 401 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Seals v. L.A. Unified School District, 797 F. App'x 327, 327 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Draper v. Coombs, 792 F.2d 915, 924 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004)(followed)
  • Washington v. Kijakazi, 72 F.4th 1029, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Atkins v. Montgomery, No. 20-56007, 2024 WL 3594386, at *2 (9th Cir. July 31, 2024)(followed)
  • Owen v. City of Hemet, No. 21-55240, 2022 WL 16945887, at *1 (9th Cir. Nov. 15, 2022)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 32.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…