Bleu Blaze Donahue v. Darren Hoschouer

Civ. No. 6:26-cv-00152-AP (D. Or. Feb. 13, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of Oregon · February 13, 2026 · No. 6:26-cv-00152-AP

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon denied Plaintiff Bleu Blaze Donahue’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order seeking to prevent his arrest on a probation-violation warrant. The court concluded that the evidence undermined Plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits and that Younger abstention weighed against injunctive relief.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff was not entitled to a temporary restraining order because he failed to make the required clear showing of entitlement to extraordinary preliminary relief.
  2. Younger abstention principles weighed against granting an injunction interfering with the pending state arrest and probation-revocation proceedings.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to a temporary restraining order preventing his arrest on a probation-violation warrant.
  2. Whether the record supported a likelihood of success on Plaintiff's retaliation theory.
  3. Whether Younger abstention principles weighed against federal injunctive relief directed at pending state proceedings.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Pacific Kidney & Hypertension LLC v. Kassakian, 156 F. Supp. 3d 1219, 1222 (D. Or. 2016)(followed)
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20, 22 (2008)(followed)
  • Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131-32 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Lopez v. Brewer, 680 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Yelp, Inc. v. Paxton, 137 F.4th 944, 950 (9th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…