Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon denied Plaintiff Bleu Blaze Donahue’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order seeking to prevent his arrest on a probation-violation warrant. The court concluded that the evidence undermined Plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits and that Younger abstention weighed against injunctive relief.
Holdings
- Plaintiff was not entitled to a temporary restraining order because he failed to make the required clear showing of entitlement to extraordinary preliminary relief.
- Younger abstention principles weighed against granting an injunction interfering with the pending state arrest and probation-revocation proceedings.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to a temporary restraining order preventing his arrest on a probation-violation warrant.
- Whether the record supported a likelihood of success on Plaintiff's retaliation theory.
- Whether Younger abstention principles weighed against federal injunctive relief directed at pending state proceedings.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Pacific Kidney & Hypertension LLC v. Kassakian, 156 F. Supp. 3d 1219, 1222 (D. Or. 2016)(followed)
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20, 22 (2008)(followed)
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131-32 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Lopez v. Brewer, 680 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Yelp, Inc. v. Paxton, 137 F.4th 944, 950 (9th Cir. 2025)(followed)
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…