Brandi G. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Brandi G. · United States District Court for the District of Oregon · April 9, 2026 · No. 6:23-cv-00687-AA

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon granted Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand and award of past-due Social Security benefits. The court approved $33,149.50 in fees, representing approximately 19.5% of the past-due benefits, and directed that previously awarded EAJA fees be offset, resulting in a payment of $15,435.14 less applicable fees. The court found the requested fee reasonable under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart and Ninth Circuit precedent.

Holdings

  1. A Social Security contingency-fee agreement is enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) only within the statutory cap of 25 percent of the claimant's past-due benefits; the agreement and requested fee here satisfied that limitation.
  2. The requested § 406(b) fee was reasonable and did not constitute an unwarranted windfall.
  3. The § 406(b) award must be reduced by the EAJA fees previously received by Plaintiff's counsel, resulting in a payment of $15,435.14 before applicable processing or user fees.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the contingency-fee agreement complied with the 25 percent cap under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A).
  2. Whether the requested § 406(b) fee of $33,149.50 was reasonable under the circumstances.
  3. Whether the § 406(b) award had to be offset by previously awarded EAJA fees.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1149, 1151-53 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
  • Galloway v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 6:18-cv-00982-MC (Sept. 9, 2019), ECF No. 27(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…