David Irizarry v. Fitness 19

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon adopts a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation recommending dismissal of David Irizarry's amended complaint against Fitness 19. Because no objections were filed and the court found no clear error, the case was dismissed.

Holdings

1. When no timely objections are filed, the district court is not required to review the magistrate judge's recommendation, but may review it sua sponte; the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error on the face of the record.
2. The Findings and Recommendation was adopted, and the case was dismissed because the court found no clear error.

Questions Presented

1. What standard of review should the district court apply to a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation when no timely objections are filed?
2. Whether the Findings and Recommendation recommending dismissal of the amended complaint should be adopted and the case dismissed.

Disposition

dismissed