Frank Gable v. Frederick Ackom, et al.

Gable · United States District Court for the District of Oregon · March 19, 2026 · No. 6:24-cv-01131-AA

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon denied Plaintiff Frank Gable’s motion to appoint personal representatives for four deceased defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The court held that the motion was not ripe because Plaintiff’s appeal of the state probate court’s decision was pending, and permitted him to renew the motion after the state proceedings became final.

Holdings

  1. The motion was not ripe because the state-court appeal could resolve whether state law was actually deficient and could eliminate any need for a federal remedy.
  2. The motion to appoint personal representatives was denied without prejudice, and Plaintiff could renew it after the state courts rendered a final decision and no appeal remained pending.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court could invoke 42 U.S.C. § 1988 to appoint personal representatives for deceased defendants while Plaintiff's appeal from the state probate court's refusal to open estates remained pending.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's motion was ripe when the alleged deficiency in state law could be eliminated by a favorable state appellate decision.

Disposition

denied

Cases Cited (3)

  • Gable v. Williams, 49 F.4th 1315, 1319-19 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 588 (1978)(followed)
  • Moor v. County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 703 (1973)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…