Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon granted Defendant Warren Roberts’s motion to dismiss claims alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs under the Eighth Amendment. The court held that the complaint did not sufficiently allege Roberts’s direct involvement or a specific policy or supervisory conduct causing the alleged constitutional injury. Dismissal was without prejudice and with leave to amend within 30 days; the court did not reach qualified immunity.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to plausibly allege that Roberts personally participated in, knew of, or made a decision concerning Lunsford's alleged denial or delay of medical care.
- The complaint failed to state a supervisory-liability claim against Roberts because its allegations concerning Roberts's policies, supervision, and role in the Therapeutic Level of Care Committee were conclusory and did not identify a specific policy or event by Roberts that caused Lunsford's injury.
- Dismissal of the claims against Roberts was warranted, but the dismissal was entered with leave to amend because the pleading defects might be remedied by alleging additional facts.
- The court did not reach the qualified-immunity argument because the claims were subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim on other grounds.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint plausibly alleged that Warren Roberts personally participated in or was directly involved in an unconstitutional denial or delay of medical care.
- Whether the complaint plausibly alleged supervisory liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on Roberts's policies, supervision, or alleged role in the Therapeutic Level of Care Committee.
- Whether the claims against Roberts should be dismissed with leave to amend.
- Whether the court needed to reach Roberts's qualified-immunity defense after determining that the complaint failed to state a claim.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (14)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 667, 676-78 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286, 290 (1999)(followed)
- Anderson v. Warner, 451 F.3d 1063, 1067 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)(followed)
- Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Colwell v. Bannister, 763 F.3d 1060, 1066 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1207-08 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…