Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon adopts a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation in an employment discrimination action. The court grants Meta Platforms, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration and denies as moot its motion to stay discovery.
Holdings
- When no party timely objects to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendation, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error on the face of the record.
- The findings and recommendation contained no clear error on the face of the record and was adopted.
- Meta's motion to compel arbitration was granted.
- Meta's motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to compel arbitration was denied as moot because the arbitration motion was resolved and granted.
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies when no party objects to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendation?
- Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation recommending that Meta's motion to compel arbitration be granted contained clear error on the face of the record.
- Whether Meta's motion to stay discovery should be granted after the motion to compel arbitration was granted.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152-54 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 382 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)(followed)
- Decker v. Berryhill, 856 F.3d 659, 663 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Hayden v. United States, 147 F. Supp. 3d 1125, 1127 (D. Or. 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…