Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon reviews a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation in a habeas action where no party filed objections. Finding no clear error on the face of the record, the court adopts the findings and recommendation and denies Robert Vincent Clark’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Holdings
- When no timely objections are filed, the district court reviews the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation for clear error on the face of the record.
- The court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation and denied Clark's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendation when no timely objections are filed?
- Whether the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the habeas petition should be adopted.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (4)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152-54 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 382 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)(followed)
- Decker v. Berryhill, 856 F.3d 659, 663 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Hayden v. United States, 147 F. Supp. 3d 1125, 1127 (D. Or. 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…