Jiselle A.C. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Jiselle A.C. · United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico · March 3, 2026 · No. Civil No. 24-1284 (GLS)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico reviewed the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of the plaintiff’s application for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits. The court held that the Administrative Law Judge’s findings regarding the plaintiff’s impairments, residual functional capacity, evaluation of medical opinions, and subjective symptoms were supported by substantial evidence and applied the correct legal standards. The Commissioner’s decision was affirmed.

Holdings

  1. The ALJ did not improperly substitute lay judgment for medical expertise because the ALJ considered medical opinions and other evidence and imposed mental and physical limitations more restrictive than those identified by the medical sources.
  2. Any deficiency in the ALJ's express discussion of the supportability and consistency factors was harmless because the decision made the ALJ's reasoning discernible and was supported by substantial evidence.
  3. The ALJ permissibly found that Plaintiff's subjective allegations were not fully consistent with the objective and other evidence and adequately incorporated supported limitations into the RFC.
  4. Remand was not warranted because the ALJ considered the existing record, assessed the likely content of the missing records, and Plaintiff failed to show prejudice or that the additional evidence was noncumulative and essential to a fair hearing.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ALJ improperly formulated Plaintiff's psychological and physical residual functional capacity by interpreting raw medical evidence as a layperson.
  2. Whether the ALJ adequately evaluated the supportability and consistency of the medical opinions and prior administrative medical findings under 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520c.
  3. Whether the ALJ improperly evaluated Plaintiff's subjective symptoms and functional limitations.
  4. Whether the incomplete additional psychiatric treatment records and the ALJ's handling of a subpoena required remand.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (32)

  • Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42, 146 (1987)(followed)
  • McDonald v. Secretary, 795 F.2d 1118, 1123 (1st Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Santiago v. Secretary, 944 F.2d 1, 5, 7 (1st Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Ortiz v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 890 F.2d 520, 524 (1st Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Seavey v. Barnhart, 276 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Manso-Pizarro v. Secretary, 76 F.3d 15, 15-17 (1st Cir. 1996)(distinguished)
  • Nguyen v. Chater, 172 F.3d 31, 35 (1st Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Purdy v. Berryhill, 887 F.3d 7, 13-14 (1st Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Biestek v. Berryhill, 587 U.S. 97, 103-04 (2019)(followed)
  • Rodríguez v. Secretary, 647 F.2d 218, 222 (1st Cir. 1981)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 32.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…