Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico reviewed objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation concerning personal jurisdiction over BAH Logistics LLC in a negligence action involving a damaged concrete pump truck. The court agreed that Puerto Rico lacked personal jurisdiction over BAH and denied jurisdictional discovery, but concluded that dismissal was not in the interest of justice. The court transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida under 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
Holdings
- The District of Puerto Rico lacked general personal jurisdiction over BAH because BAH was not essentially at home in Puerto Rico, and Morales did not object to that finding.
- Morales failed to establish that his negligence claim arose out of or related to BAH's contacts with Puerto Rico.
- BAH's single shipping contract with Morales did not constitute purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in Puerto Rico.
- The gestalt factors did not strongly favor or disfavor jurisdiction, but they could not overcome Morales's failure to establish relatedness and purposeful availment.
- Morales was not entitled to jurisdictional discovery because discovery was unlikely to reveal contacts related to the claim or establish purposeful availment and therefore would be futile.
- Transfer to the Middle District of Florida was warranted because that court could have exercised personal jurisdiction over the defendants, venue was proper there, and transfer was in the interest of justice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the District of Puerto Rico had general or specific personal jurisdiction over BAH Logistics LLC.
- Whether Morales was entitled to limited jurisdictional discovery.
- Whether the action should be transferred to the Middle District of Florida under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 rather than dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (26)
- Ramos-Echevarría v. Pichis, Inc., 698 F. Supp. 2d 262, 264 (D.P.R. 2010)(followed)
- Sylva v. Culebra Dive Shop, 389 F. Supp. 2d 189, 191-92 (D.P.R. 2005)(followed)
- United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 673 (1980)(followed)
- Davet v. Maccorone, 973 F.2d 22, 30-31 (1st Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Borden v. Secretary of H.H.S., 836 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 247 (1st Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Álamo Rodríguez v. Pfizer Pharms., Inc., 286 F. Supp. 2d 144, 146 (D.P.R. 2003)(followed)
- Hernández-Mejías v. General Electric, 428 F. Supp. 2d 4, 6 (D.P.R. 2005)(followed)
- Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Det. Facility, 334 F. Supp. 2d 114, 125-26 (D.R.I. 2004)(followed)
- Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC v. Alpenrose Dairy, Inc., 825 F.3d 28, 34-39 (1st Cir. 2016)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.