Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico denied Plaintiff Ricardo Rivera-Ortiz’s request for judicial notice of statistical information concerning women veterans from government websites. The court held that the statistics were not adjudicative facts relevant to the claims and were not shown to be beyond reasonable dispute under Federal Rule of Evidence 201; it also distinguished authentication under Rule 902 from judicial notice.
Holdings
- The court may not take judicial notice under Rule 201(b)(1) of specialized national demographic statistics that are not generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court.
- The court may take judicial notice that information appears on an identified government website, but it may not judicially notice the truth, accuracy, or methodology of statistical data that is not shown to be beyond reasonable dispute and is not an adjudicative fact relevant to the particular case.
- Self-authentication under Federal Rule of Evidence 902 does not independently establish that information qualifies for judicial notice under Rule 201(b).
- Whether the sources were presented during the deposition did not alter the judicial-notice analysis, and arguments or requests raised for the first time in a reply brief were waived.
Questions Presented
- Whether the statistical information from the government websites was an adjudicative fact generally known within the court's jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Evidence 201(b)(1).
- Whether the statistical information was capable of accurate and ready determination from sources whose accuracy could not reasonably be questioned under Federal Rule of Evidence 201(b)(2).
- Whether the sources could be judicially noticed or admitted merely because some government publications or Internet materials may be self-authenticating under Federal Rule of Evidence 902.
- Whether the court needed to determine whether Plaintiff had presented or disclosed the sources during a deposition.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (15)
- Getty Petroleum Mktg., Inc. v. Cap. Terminal Co., 391 F.3d 312, 321 (1st Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Romero-Acosta v. Kindred Spirits, Inc., 2025 WL 2147158, at *7 (D.P.R. June 27, 2025)(followed)
- Lussier v. Runyon, 50 F.3d 1103, 1113-1114 (1st Cir. 1995)(followed)
- MVM Inc. v. Rodriguez, 568 F. Supp. 2d 158, 164 (D.P.R. 2008)(followed)
- Int’l Star Class Yacht Racing Assoc. v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 146 F.3d 66, 70 (2d Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Santiago-Sepúlveda v. Esso Std. Oil Co. (Puerto Rico), Inc., No. CV 08-1950 (CCC), 2008 WL 11357960, at *2 (D.P.R. Oct. 30, 2008)(followed)
- Rodrique v. Hearst Communications, Inc., 126 F.4th 85, 92 n.3 (1st Cir. 2025)(followed)
- In re Financial Oversight and Mgm’t Bd. for Puerto Rico, 60 F.4th 9, 13 n.3 (1st Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Gebremichael v. I.N.S., 10 F.3d 28, 37 n.25 (1st Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger, 599 F.3d 984, 994 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…