Powell v. C/O Bermudez

Powell · United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island · June 3, 2026 · No. C.A. No. 24-73MSM

Summary

This Report and Recommendation addresses Defendant Correctional Officer Bermudez’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b). The magistrate judge recommends dismissing Plaintiff Devanji L. Powell’s § 1983 excessive-force action without prejudice based on his failure to comply with a discovery order and his failure to prosecute the case.

Holdings

  1. A court may dismiss an action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(v) when a party fails to obey an order requiring discovery, after considering the circumstances of the noncompliance and the availability of lesser sanctions.
  2. An action may be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when a plaintiff completely fails to prosecute and does not comply with court orders, particularly where warnings have been given and lesser sanctions would not restore prosecution.
  3. Dismissal should be without prejudice where the record does not show intentional misconduct, although refiling may be subject to the applicable statute of limitations.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff's failure to comply with a court order compelling discovery warranted sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(v).
  2. Whether Plaintiff's prolonged failure to prosecute independently supported dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
  3. Whether dismissal should be without prejudice in light of the absence of evidence of intentional misconduct.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • De Barros v. From You Flowers, LLC, 566 F. Supp. 3d 149, 152 (D.R.I. 2021)(followed)
  • Vallejo v. Santini-Padilla, 607 F.3d 1, 7-8 (1st Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Silva v. Faria, Civil Action No. 22-10172-FDS, 2024 WL 3011221, at *2 (D. Mass. June 14, 2024)(followed)
  • Silva v. Faria, Civil Action No. 22-10172-FDS, 2024 WL 3011221, at *2 (D. Mass. June 14, 2024), appeal dismissed, No. 24-1610, 2024 WL 5346587 (1st Cir. Oct. 16, 2024)(noted)
  • Rose v. Davis, C.A. No. 23-cv-13-MRD-PAS, 2025 WL 1444736, at *2-3 (D.R.I. May 20, 2025)(distinguished)
  • Brenner v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc., 867 F.3d 294, 297 n.7 (1st Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…