Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopts the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and grants Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by a pretrial detainee concerning an injury caused by an electrical detention-center gate. The court finds no clear error in the recommendation that Plaintiff failed to establish deliberate indifference to a serious medical need and that Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.
Holdings
- When no specific objections are filed to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court need not conduct de novo review and instead reviews the record for clear error.
- Plaintiff failed to present evidence sufficient to establish that Defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need or to create a genuine dispute of material fact, and disagreement with the adequacy of medical care did not amount to a constitutional violation.
- Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's recommendation granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment contained clear error when no specific objections were filed.
- Whether Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute of material fact that Defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need.
- Whether Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976)(followed)
- Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975)(followed)
- United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 & n.4 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147 (1985)(followed)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…