Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and dismissed without prejudice a pro se state prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court dismissed the action without requiring the respondent to file an answer or return and denied a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- When no timely objection is filed to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court need not conduct de novo review and instead reviews the recommendation for clear error on the face of the record.
- The petition was dismissed without prejudice without requiring Respondent to file an answer or return.
- A certificate of appealability should not issue because Petitioner did not meet the applicable standard requiring a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should review the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation for clear error when the petitioner filed no objections.
- Whether the petition should be dismissed without prejudice without requiring the respondent to file an answer or return.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000)(followed)
- Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…