Summary
A United States magistrate judge recommends denying state prisoner Lamont Cutner’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. The recommendation concludes that the requested relief concerns claims unrelated to the underlying complaint, seeks a prison transfer beyond the court’s authority, and does not establish a likely constitutional violation or actual injury.
Court
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Greenville Division
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Greenville Division
Decision date
December 30, 2025
Docket number
6:25-cv-13050-RMG-KFM
Disposition
other
Questions Presented
- Whether Cutner was entitled to a preliminary injunction or TRO based on allegations unrelated to the claims in his complaint.
- Whether the court could order his transfer to another state prison.
- Whether the alleged denial of law-library access, taking of property, and interference with mail established constitutional violations supporting preliminary relief.
Holdings
- A preliminary injunction or TRO may not issue to address alleged injuries unrelated to the wrong asserted in the underlying complaint; because Cutner's motion concerned retaliation, law-library access, mail, and property while his complaint concerned a separate July incident, the requested relief was improper.
- The requested transfer to another South Carolina Department of Corrections institution was relief the federal court could not grant because federal courts do not sit to supervise state prisons and inmate-transfer decisions are reserved to state-prison officials.
- The plaintiff was not entitled to law-library access as such; he was entitled to meaningful access to the courts, which requires specific allegations and an actual injury. Cutner failed to allege actual injury because he submitted his filings without missing deadlines.
- A negligent or unauthorized deprivation of personal property does not establish a constitutional violation when adequate state post-deprivation remedies are available; South Carolina provides such remedies.
- A vague allegation that defendants were 'messing' with the plaintiff's mail, without specific allegations against identified defendants, did not state a claim sufficient to support preliminary relief.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…