Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopts a magistrate judge’s recommendation and summarily dismisses without prejudice Vincent M. Ruggiero’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. The court concludes that the action is duplicative of another pending case concerning the application of First Step Act earned time credits and denies a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- A habeas petition that duplicates another pending action may be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.
- The district court must conduct a de novo determination of portions of a magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is made and may review unobjected-to portions for clear error.
- A certificate of appealability will not issue because Petitioner did not satisfy the applicable substantial-showing standard.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petition should be summarily dismissed as duplicative of another pending habeas action.
- What standard of review governed the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation after Petitioner filed objections.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270–71 (1976)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484–85 (2000)(followed)
- Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336–38 (2003)(followed)
- Ruggiero v. Warden, No. 5:25-cv-11171-JDA-KDW(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…