Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina reviewed the denial of Anthony Willis Evans's claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. The court rejected the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to affirm, concluding that the ALJ's evaluation of Evans's chronic back pain, migraine headaches, and consulting physician's opinions was not supported by substantial evidence. The court reversed the Commissioner's decision under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- The Commissioner's decision was not supported by substantial evidence because the ALJ inadequately assessed the evidence documenting Evans's chronic back pain and frequent migraine headaches.
- The ALJ failed to properly evaluate Dr. Hamada's opinions under 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520c because the record supported and was consistent with her conclusions regarding Evans's back and migraine-related limitations.
- Remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) was warranted for further proceedings consistent with the order.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Commissioner's decision denying Disability Insurance Benefits was supported by substantial evidence.
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated the medical opinion of the Social Security Administration's consulting examining physician under 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520c.
- Whether the ALJ adequately evaluated Evans's reports and medical evidence concerning chronic back pain and frequent migraine headaches.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (5)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976)(followed)
- Thomas v. Celebrezze, 331 F.2d 541, 543 (4th Cir. 1964)(followed)
- Vitek v. Finch, 438 F.2d 1157, 1157 (4th Cir. 1971)(followed)
- Flack v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 278, 279 (4th Cir. 1969)(followed)
- Coffman v. Bowen, 829 F.2d 514, 519 (4th Cir. 1987)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…